Skip to Content
3-05-2012 @ 9:20AM
Welcome Megan,If i may offer some constructive criticism, your article seems very unfocused, like a moth in a lightbulb factory, you seem to dart back and forth between lots of different topics at once without really clarifying any of them.Just my two cents.
3-05-2012 @ 9:26AM
I thought it was pretty clear; the topic was: here's what's changed in the talent calculator recently, here's what the devs have said the rationale is, and here's how that ties together into their vision for each spec...
3-05-2012 @ 9:52AM
First of all, Welcome Megan and nice write up- @Phoenix, your "constructive criticism" is not only off the mark but rather trollish. I too am excited to see the warlock column back in action and hope it continues for years to come. With mists on the horizon we could use a resource and fresh perspective on things ;)
3-05-2012 @ 10:16AM
I don't know if it was scattered/unfocused, so much as it looked as if Megan was trying to catch up on a lot of information. I do not play a warlock - so I know nothing about them and this article not only gave me a lot of information very quickly and in an amusing fashion, it has also spurred my interest in leveling one.
3-05-2012 @ 10:40AM
I agree with Catsmeow: it looked like she was trying to jam a lot of info into a little column, the net result being she couldn't go too in depth with any one thing. That did give off a bit of an unfocused vibe at first, but then I realized she was just trying to catch us up on all the things.Here's hoping the next column is spec specific so she can go a little more in depth. :) I keep trying to level a demo lock because omg metamorphosis, but it's terribly boring before you get that awesome spell.
3-05-2012 @ 11:00AM
@phoenix: If you were really attempting to offer "constructive" criticism, you would have given some examples of "seem to dart back and forth between lots of different topics at once without really clarifying any of them". Instead, your "constructive" criticism seems to rest upon your use of "moth in a lightbulb factory", which one can only imagine you heard somewhere and have been dying to use on someone else.I thought the article was well-written and focused on the topic clearly spelled out in the title: the changes in the new MoP talent calculator. I especially liked the clarification of destruction's new image.
3-05-2012 @ 5:01PM
Silly warlocks. Let me explain. He's a mage. Keep writing Megan, it was great. You may want to threaten mages a bit more though, or else they'll feel entitled to troll. It's all good though, you're the new kid on the block and learning.So remember -- You hate mages. You wanna eat their heads, or something. idk, I'm an every-class type of player :) (But I have an 85 lock and not an 85 mage!)I hope to hear from you again next week!
First time? A confirmation email will be sent to you after submitting.
Members enter your username and password.
Enter your AOL or AIM screenname and password.
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.