Also on AOL
- Autos
- Technology
- Lifestyle
- Gaming
- Finance
- Entertainment on AOL
- Lifestyle on AOL
- Sports on AOL
- Travel on AOL
- More on AOL
Featured Galleries
Joystiq
© 2013 AOL Inc. All rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks | AOL A-Z HELP | About Our Ads

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
3-05-2012 @ 10:00AM
phoenix-auria said...
It wasn't intended to be trollish at all. I was simply trying to suggest that it could use more focus.
Personally I found it difficult to read.
Reply
3-05-2012 @ 10:26AM
Noyou said...
Perhaps my reading level is sub par then. I had no problems reading it whatsoever.
3-05-2012 @ 12:21PM
Pistolera said...
Your comment wasn't constructive. And your metaphor was bizarre (and unhelpful).
What was disorganized about this post? We had subheads for leveling spells, a subhead for talents, and then Destro/Demo/Afflic in their own little chunks. The article accomplished what it set out to do -- quickly dish out the changes that the MoP talent calculator brings for Warlocks at the moment -- which is what Megan managed to do.
Offering up actual suggestions and not blank statements that go nowhere is what's constructive.
For instance:
Instead of saying "Your article seems unfocused." You could have said, "I feel there is too much information here for such a brief article. Maybe next time, you could tackle the changes for each spec in separate articles, so there is more depth and clarity."