The most wicked creatures in WoW
Warcraft is a game that seems fairly straightforward in faction division. Alliance is good; Horde is bad. But once you delve into it, that straightforwardness becomes muddled and marred. The Alliance may seem like good guys, but they have their bad moments, and the Horde may seem evil, but even they've got their shining examples of goodness buried within. And when you examine the story and lore closely, you begin to realize that there is no black-and-white division between good and evil; all characters are loosely scattered and somewhere in shades of gray.
Sure, you can argue that the orcs are evil -- and they absolutely were, back in the day. But when you start looking at the justifications for the orcs' actions, that label of pure evil comes into question. As for the Alliance, you can argue that the human race is a bastion of goodness and light -- but then you look at things like the Scarlet Crusade, at Benedictus' betrayal, and you begin to wonder whether the human race is inherently good or just as scattered as the rest of the world.
... Unless, of course, you look at the one place where evil characters always hang out: instances.
Sure, you can argue that the orcs are evil -- and they absolutely were, back in the day. But when you start looking at the justifications for the orcs' actions, that label of pure evil comes into question. As for the Alliance, you can argue that the human race is a bastion of goodness and light -- but then you look at things like the Scarlet Crusade, at Benedictus' betrayal, and you begin to wonder whether the human race is inherently good or just as scattered as the rest of the world.
... Unless, of course, you look at the one place where evil characters always hang out: instances.

Instead, undead have so far dominated the category. Now Stubborn hasn't finished the study just yet -- next is an examination of Burning Crusade dungeons, then I imagine Wrath and Cataclysm dungeons will follow. And there's a fine line between undead and Forsaken -- while a lot of these bosses are indisputably undead, they don't fall under the classification of Forsaken, with some exceptions of course for bosses like Lord Godfrey over in Shadowfang Keep, among others.
As far as raid bosses are concerned, trolls come in handily in second place. But with classic dungeons, trolls are shoved down to fourth place, and in second place behind undead are ... humans. The more I think about it, the more I remember fighting mostly human bosses in vanilla WoW, particularly when leveling in the vicinity of Stormwind. Over on the Horde side, your first dungeon features orc cultists, demons, elementals and troggs, so at least there are some orc enemies to be found. But as you leveled through Horde territory, your next stop was invariably Wailing Caverns, which featured night elves.

All wondering aside, I'm really interested in seeing where the rest of Stubborn's calculations go, particularly after Outland dungeons, as the draenei right now are pretty much destined for sainthood in the Warcraft universe, if the trend of the totals we've seen so far continues. It does seem, however, that we can safely agree on one thing. Being undead? It means you're pretty bad.
Filed under: Analysis / Opinion






Reader Comments (Page 1 of 3)
anonymous Mar 7th 2012 9:14AM
"Being undead? It means you're pretty badASS."
Fixed that for you.
Victory for Sylvanas!
Eldoron Mar 7th 2012 10:57AM
mixing in-game references with real life? i see what you did there...
MikeLive Mar 7th 2012 9:27AM
After doing Silverpine Forest, it's completely convinced me that the Horde always were and always be the bad guys intent on taking anything and everything the non-Horde races hold dear.
Seriously, the tone of that zone would be like George Lucas trying to convince people that Palpatine was the protagonist.
lpfanjoey Mar 7th 2012 10:51AM
I disagree, while I found it a bit hard to swallow with Lady Sylvanas' actions, she doesn't represent the entire Horde faction. As a matter of fact she was expressly forbidden from using the plague to begin with. And even then she did it with the intentions of ensuring her species survival because if the forsaken all die out, theres noone to hold territory in 90% of Eastern Kingdoms for the Horde.
So can what she did be interpreted as evil? Sure. Did she do them for purely evil purposes? No. Therefore we go back to the moral gray of wow.
MikeLive Mar 7th 2012 11:04AM
I'm not talking about the Plague. I'm talking about the ruthless and unsubstantiated invasion and massacre of Gilneas. It's the forced conversion of their citizens, then being insulted when they use the free will you gave them to actually think for themselves. Claiming that Lordaeron is rightfully theirs as they were the humans of the land formerly, then taking anothrr's rightful lands away.
Plainswander Mar 7th 2012 12:02PM
Heh, SYlvannas could give a rats patoot about her "species" survival. She's concerned about one thing and one thing only now, her OWN survival and accumulation of power. She spends her tropps like water, and she never has a single regret.
Plus, y'know, making deal with Valk'yr and such. Lying to her allies. Forcing control of dissidents. Etc etc etc....
She's flat out "bark at moon laugh maniacally and monologue" evil.
Now, there are some Not-Evil forsaken, sure (Lillian Voss? Brutal, Vengeful, Amoral, but not "evil"....), but Sylvannas has crossed fully and completely into "One DImensional Charicature Who Will Kill In A Raid Soon" territory.
clundgren Mar 7th 2012 1:03PM
See, what I took out of Silverpine is that the Forsaken, feeling utterly rejected by the rest of the world, and by humanity in particular, have become fanatically devoted to each other. There are numerous examples of Forsaken selflessly sacrificing themselves to save other Forsaken. There is also the touching mini-questline involving the Forsaken soldier who is utterly terrified of the living.
The Forsaken do come off as ruthless to anyone they see as an outsider, but most are absolutely loyal to each other. Even Sylvanas comes off as a sympathetic character in some ways. So I guess how one interprets those zones is purely in the eye of the beholder. Which is kind of good storytelling.
clundgren Mar 7th 2012 1:10PM
And I think you guys who think Sylvanas should be a raid boss are nuts. She's the most interesting character in the game. Why on earth would you want to get rid of her? We need more complex characters, not less.
Al Mar 7th 2012 3:11PM
"How dare people not be dead, I kill them now". She's not that complex.
naixdra Mar 7th 2012 6:29PM
The thing is the invasion of Gilneas was a Horde invasion, not Forsaken. They were the vast majority of the forces for the obvious reason of location. However, Sylvanas didn't want Gilneas, Garrosh did.
The only reason Gilneas has any value to any non-Gilnean is its proximity to the Alliance held southern Eastern Kingdoms.
Garrosh wants it, the Alliance doesn't want Garrosh to have it. Same deal with Tol Barad.
Besides the 'forced conversion' happened to three Gilneans, who all were killed in Shadowfang Keep. The rest became Worgen, were killed, or escaped.
@Plainswander
She used to not care at all about the Forsaken, and use them like water. Same with her rangers while living.
Now she wants to protect them, because they protect her.
At least that is what I got from her perspective on them going from 'Arrows in her quiver' to 'a Bulwark against the infinite'.
You shoot an arrow and don't care about it as long as it hits your enemy, a shield has to be maintained, cared for, or it will fail you.
Again, that's just what I got from it.
clundgren Mar 8th 2012 1:01AM
@Al,
I hope the rest of your thinking is more complex than that comment suggests, because if that caricature is all that you take away from Sylvanas in the game, I cannot take you seriously.
Al Mar 8th 2012 1:41AM
There's also "I found out I'm hell-bound, so I'm forcing my fate on anyone I can kill as a shield to save myself from the people I couldn't kill." Being a spiteful bitch trying to share damnation still isn't complex.
Jamie Mar 7th 2012 9:31AM
Sheep the diamond? Moon is always my sheeping shape.
Sheep the Moon!
Diamond was always a misc secondary CC. Whilst Hunter freeze traps earned their own icon in Square.
This could be an article in itself!
Phil Mar 7th 2012 9:54AM
Sheeping the Moon was the first thought in my head when i read that as well. You are not alone!
clundgren Mar 7th 2012 1:04PM
Sheep moon. Freeze square. Repentance star.
RedMosquito Mar 7th 2012 4:32PM
Star is for Sap!
Zayd Mar 7th 2012 9:38AM
Michael Jackson, a belf if ever there was one.
ten20four Mar 7th 2012 11:06AM
And yet his dance was given to Night Elves.
Killik Mar 7th 2012 9:42AM
Interesting analysis. Perhaps I'm being being super-picky, but isn't Gurtogg Bloodboil, of Black Temple fame, an orc boss? Teron Gorefiend is an undead orc and, if we count him, why not Deathbringer Saurfang?
I guess the undead/free will thing screws up a lot of stuff - after all, Prince Malchezaar of Karazhan is a corrupted draenei.
Revynn Mar 7th 2012 11:01AM
Small gripe: Malchezar is not a "corrupted Draenei", as the Draenei did not exist before the corruption of the Eredar. He's an Eredar which, after something like 25,000 years of demonic influence and energy, makes him a demon.