Also on AOL
- Autos
- Technology
- Lifestyle
- Gaming
- Finance
- Entertainment on AOL
- Lifestyle on AOL
- Sports on AOL
- Travel on AOL
- More on AOL
Featured Galleries
Joystiq
© 2013 AOL Inc. All rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks | AOL A-Z HELP | About Our Ads

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
3-19-2012 @ 3:29AM
Vlad said...
It is faction bias because everything revolves around the Horde. Why help them take down the warchief when you can nuke it all down and be the sole victor ? It would be the best way to act and a great revenge for what the Horde did to Theramore (will do in the pre-patch but you get my ideea).
Divide and Conquer ! Only now you don't have to divide. JUST NUKE ! from a fleet of Skybreakers :D
Reply
3-19-2012 @ 4:43AM
Possum said...
So if we kill Varian will it even things out, cause that can be arranged..
3-19-2012 @ 10:19AM
Killik said...
If you think nuking down your enemies' cities is the right thing to do, perhaps you'd be better suited to playing Forsaken.
3-19-2012 @ 12:30PM
byronius_prime said...
I am highly pro-Alliance biased. If it came to that however I would neither condone nor condemn nuclear explosions in Orgrimmar's vicinity. It certainly isn't the right thing to do, however favorable the outcome were for the Alliance.
3-19-2012 @ 1:24PM
Killik said...
@byronius Not an attack, just an observation: that puts you morally slightly south of Garrosh Hellscream. Yikes!