Mists of Pandaria: Siege of Orgrimmar

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)

3-19-2012 @ 6:45AM

Killik said...

You can obviously see how someone could *choose* to interpret this as a sign of Horde bias - what, after all, could be more Horde-heavy than besieging Orgrimmar and the Alliance is just a tool to advance the Horde's plot...

But what if it was the other way around? What if the expansion culminated in the Horde besieging Stormwind and deposing Wrynn in favour of someone more tractable (and let's say it's not Anduin)?

Wouldn't the cries of faction bias be even more pronounced? They wouldn't be from exactly the same people and they wouldn't be for the same reason, but they would be louder. What story decision can be taken that wouldn't be interpreted as bias, by a sufficiently nuanced interpretation?

Add your comments

Your comments:

Remember me

E-Mail me when someone replies to this comment

Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.

When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.

To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.