Two Bosses Enter: Echo of Sylvanas vs. Warlord Zon'ozz

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)

3-20-2012 @ 2:50PM

Rai said...

I'd like to summarise one key event of this fight to demonstrate what might happen.

If Zon'ozz pushes Sylvanas into casting Wracking Pain and Sacrifice, he'd be trapped in the middle of a ring of ghouls. If the shadowy orb is up, it'd have nowhere to go and be bounced back by any one of the ghouls, forcing him into his shadowy "take extra damage" phase, while Sylvanas is immune to all damage during that time. By that point, sacrifice will hit and wipe most, if not all, of his health.

It doesn't matter how much life he drains from her or the amount of damage he does before she jumps up into the air, poor Zon'ozz's abilities are his own handicap here.

3-20-2012 @ 5:31PM

Garnlok said...

Actually it won't work that way because of a little known point on the shado orb mechanic: It has a several second CD on the bounce where it can't hit Zon'ozz. My raid wiped a half dozen times in a single night even though we knew the mechanics because our groups where to close together and when the melee group moved it went strait through Zon'ozz cause of the internal CD (and bounced off the tank). This means during ghoul phase it would bounce against the ghouls repeatedly, frying them all, allowing Zon'ozz to escape the ring and his orb to hit the wall, giving him the victory.

Add your comments

Your comments:

Remember me

E-Mail me when someone replies to this comment

Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.

When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.

To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.