Does the Annual Pass guarantee instant beta access?

A number of WoW Annual Pass subscribers are upset over a change to the Annual Pass terms, which now grant access to the Mists of Pandaria beta test over successive invite batches as opposed to the originally advertised "when it goes live." When the Annual Pass was announced at BlizzCon, I had never dreamed that Blizzard would let in press, fan sites, players, Annual Pass holders, opt-in players, and more at the exact same time. It has not been the norm for Blizzard to run things in such a way, but these days, it's hard to expect the norm from Irvine.
My honest reaction to this whole controversy is that in the course of four weeks, it won't be a huge deal because a majority of people looking to get beta access immediately will probably have it. The people who have or had beta access will do what a majority of players do -- play for a little bit, check out the pandas, show their friends, and then they're gone until release day. That's fine and dandy, no doubt about it, but a lot of the rhetoric coming from the community is that beta was a chance for them to try the game and see for themselves. That's not what a beta is about, in principle.
As it turns out, Blizzard has been talking about beta invites going out in waves since shortly after making the announcement at BlizzCon, where beta access for Annual Pass subscribers was confirmed. On Oct. 25, 2011, support forum blue Vrakthris posted:
Quote:
Should be enough room? Should be?!? Wait a minute. I thought that one of the benefits was guaranteed access to the beta. Your post now leaves me with the following questions (none of which are addressed in the FAQ):
Should be enough room? Should be?!? Wait a minute. I thought that one of the benefits was guaranteed access to the beta. Your post now leaves me with the following questions (none of which are addressed in the FAQ):
Yes, there should be plenty of room, with a smiley face. I'm not entirely certain why you have the impression that you wouldn't be given access to beta. That is one of the benefits of doing the Annual Pass.
Quote:
Will this access be granted on day one of the beta?
Or is it possible that we won't get access until, say, the last 3 days?
Is there a possibility that we will not be given access to the beta at all?
Will this access be granted on day one of the beta?
Or is it possible that we won't get access until, say, the last 3 days?
Is there a possibility that we will not be given access to the beta at all?
Access to beta is sent out in waves. I don't have details as to what wave you may be in but it will likely be when testing moves to the open beta phase.
No, to the last two questions.
Only two days after wrapping up BlizzCon did Blizzard see things already turn -- numbers have been calculated, and it looks like there are going to be a lot more people in this thing than they thought.
Just poorly worded marketing
Many subscribers are citing the original text of the Annual Pass blog post that said access to the Mists beta would be guaranteed when the beta went live. Mike Morhaime also stated during the opening ceremonies of BlizzCon 2011 that "in addition to getting Diablo III free you will also get guaranteed access into the next World of Warcraft expansion beta when it goes live." You can easily read into his statement that a player will be given immediate access to the beta when it goes live. That's the plain text, right? Well, you don't get to asterisk a press conference, and the statement almost feels a bit puffed up for the fans to get excited about access to the beta.
If we want to get nitpicky, Morhaime focused on the "guaranteed" part of the beta access and not its timetable. "When it goes live" is not necessarily "the moment we flip the switch."
Technically, Annual Pass subscribers have guaranteed access to the Mists of Pandaria beta when it goes live -- a guaranteed spot. Due to foreseeable limitations in server hardware and architecture, in addition to the reasonable expectation of what beta access entails, are we really surprised that it might take some time to dole out the beta invites? What about the very fact that you never have unhindered access to a beta, as there are no promises when the servers will be up or down for testing, since it is not a retail product?
Unforeseen?
Remember when the first successful MMO launched and the servers crashed? You do, because that's how most MMOs enter the market -- crashing and burning before they got out of the gate. The unforeseen dramatic MMO launch is an imagination of the past. These days, you need infrastructure that supports the rush. So why then didn't Blizzard realize that so many people would want into the WoW Annual Pass and have to swap to the beta wave system?
Simple -- Blizzard's never done something like this before. Pets and mounts in the store are one thing, but a year commitment is an entirely different product for a type of gamer who might not even exist. That turned out to not be the case, but could you imagine if we had been at BlizzCon 2011 when Mike Morhaime announced the WoW Annual Pass and the crowd had been silent? You'd be able to see the sun against the Durotar sky, finally not blocked out by the wings of thousands of Tyrael's Chargers.
Business development does all that it can to open up new markets for revenue, and the Annual Pass turned out to be a hit. When the beta became too huge for "immediate" access, the circumstances of the present changed the rules.

Law and our society are concerned about the "reasonable" everything. What does the reasonable man do when he backs his car out of the garage? We need a concept of reasonableness so we can have a point of comparison for our topic of discussion.
The reasonableness of the statement "you will get beta access when it goes live" is sound when the number of people who signed up for the Annual Pass was that of a reasonable beta server, yes? Or, in Blizzard's case, a company of Blizzard's size with the assumed cash flow and operations that come with that size, and a reasonable number of servers for beta testing. When over a million people want in, the task becomes unreasonable. What about the layman who sees beta access and assumes?
One million players downloading the Mists of Pandaria client, even over a peer-to-peer system like the Blizzard downloader, is still taxing. Then there is the back end process of creating invitations, flagging accounts, running support, fielding a million more phone calls about a technically unsupported beta ...
Do you see where this is heading? A million people signed up for the Annual Pass. More sign up every day. More people signed up for the Annual Pass than most MMOs have in total population. The Mists of Pandaria beta client alone is already a healthier, larger game than tons of MMOs out there. Blizzard should have expected this response -- and for the most part, it did.
Game development is fluid
Making promises about game development is a fool's errand. Ask any game developer. The best you can do is trust in the schedule and milestones, arm yourself to the teeth with food and high spirits, and make a damn good game. Somehow, it all works.
Zarhym posted about the current state of the beta and what is available to the tiny number of people who got in so far, which have mainly been press, an initial small wave of opt-ins (most likely to test the system and get people downloading the client), and some Annual Pass subscribers (again, to see if all the knobs and switches work.) Currently, the continent of Pandaria isn't even up on the beta servers, meaning a good 95% of the game is absent from testing.
Not only are there other threads on the subject of Annual Pass holders not getting invited in this very tiny wave of initial participants -- where the continent of Pandaria isn't yet available -- this one is incredibly misleading.
The Mists beta is, as of this point, an extremely limited experience. You can throw a million people onto four servers and watch them complain on the forums, but that's not really fun. I have a feeling that this could all have been avoided if Blizzard let everyone download the client and only give access to the invite waves, just to placate those who wanted to have the client ready to go when they did get invited.
Expectation
Is it our fault for being excited about a compelling program? Not at all. Should we expect clarification from Blizzard? I think an explanation of the terms is perfectly acceptable. Remember, at least you're getting in before the unwashed masses, and the players who signed up day one of the Annual Pass are getting priority.
The real issue here is not the commitment made or the money paid but something deeper. Many players had the assumption and expectation of how things work without understanding the mechanics behind a million-person live roll-out of a game admittedly not ready for release. The real problem is that players' feelings were hurt immediately after an exciting information reveal.
How will Blizzard rectify this situation? I don't think it has to. Players, however, feel like the company must answer. Over the course of the next few weeks, everyone in the Annual Pass promotion will most likely get the chance to be a part of the beta like they were promised -- a place to log in to once or twice, roll around on a pandaren, and log out until release.
Boilerplate warning
Edit: I added a bit to this paragraph to make its intent a bit more clear. Please excuse me.
This one is going to hurt. Oh, this is going to be painful, specifically for those of you emailing me about subscribing after the wording was changed. If you're one of those people who gets a little queasy around boilerplate, you're going to want to scroll back up. I'm so sorry. Just rip the Band-Aid. Just rip the Band-Aid...
Offer subject to change without notice. No delay or omission by Blizzard Entertainment in exercising or enforcing any right or remedy contained in this offer shall operate as a waiver thereof or of any other legal right or remedy available to Blizzard Entertainment.
Filed under: Analysis / Opinion, The Lawbringer






Reader Comments (Page 2 of 10)
jmyoung Mar 24th 2012 12:19PM
they changed nothing in the agreement you signed the only wording that changed was promotional material which honestly is an ad. And the change wasn't even that substantial to warrant all this "they rewrote the contract" bull...the TOU are the same now as when i signed up in October nothing in the agreement has be broken unless they end the beta and you didn't get an invite...its really very simple.
Vael Mar 23rd 2012 12:15PM
So, does the Boilerplate = We reserve the right to not give you a free copy of Diablo III, not give you MoP Beta Access, the right to take away your pony?
(Not that I think they would do any of this, because the bad PR would kill the company)
Plainswander Mar 23rd 2012 12:17PM
yup, that it does.
Kar On E Mar 23rd 2012 12:22PM
I don't know that it fully does, at least not without replacing it with something else. It gives them the right to alter the deal and force us to pray they do not alter it further. However, I think completely taking out items advertised would put them into a breach of contract.
At the very least, I think taking those away would kick in a material averse clause, which would mean you could break it whenever.
aminnocci Mar 23rd 2012 12:40PM
Kar On E is correct - removing any portion of the consideration (Diablo 3, beta, mount) would make the contract null and void, and if you (the signee) has delivered on your consideration (paid for 12 months) you could sue for breach.
The boilerplate has more to do with the ability to still enforce the contract if something changed such as Blizzard being purchased by another company.
Martin Mar 23rd 2012 12:40PM
@Kar On E
"It gives them the right to alter the deal and force us to pray they do not alter it further."
Did anyone else hear this in Darth Vader's voice?
Architect Mar 23rd 2012 1:21PM
“Offer subject to change without notice.”
This means that Blizzard has the right to change the offer to people who haven’t previously accepted it. This does NOT mean that Blizzard can change the terms of its contract with people who have already accepted it.
So, even though Blizz offered me D3, mount and beta, it can still offer you just the D3 and mount, as long as you haven’t already signed on to the Annual Pass. Once Blizz and I enter the contract, it is no longer “subject to change without notice.”
Daedalus Mar 23rd 2012 1:42PM
Actually, I believe (and have no legal background...) that the first part of it, that "offer subject to change without notice" bit is more meant for going forward; like, Blizzard has said we have until May 1st to sign up, but they could discontinue (or completely change) the offer this afternoon and no one could say that they still had to honor it. Essentially, it's saying: "No rainchecks."
The second part is more about Blizzard's actions if you violate the deal; to whit, if you don't follow through and Blizzard doesn't immediately take some remedy spelled out in the argreement (like charging you for the time you were supposed to pay for, or taking back your mount) right away, they reserve the right to do that at some point in the future. In other words, if you cancel your subscription immediately, and they give you diablo 3 anyway, they could still come back a year later and take it away, under the terms of the agreement.
So, I don't think the boilerplate really applies to the whole argument about when people are supposed to be let in. However, that doesn't matter. Even if Blizzard had said in large letters at the top of the agreement that you got day 1 access to the beta, who's to say how exactly a beta is defined? What we have now is a beta only because that's what Blizzard's calling it. If they wanted to call it a pre-beta ramp-up test, they could, and still be holding to their agreement by waiting to call it the "official beta" once all invites have been sent out.
So, in short, to all the people who said they were promised access as soon as the beta went live, I'd ask them to point out where the agreement precisely defined the terms "beta" and "live."
Mathew McCurley Mar 23rd 2012 1:50PM
I clarified the paragraph. Sorry for the confusion, all.
Some emails that I were getting were literally "how can Blizzard change these terms on me, or ever, for anyone."
Anafielle Mar 23rd 2012 12:28PM
"I bought an annual pass and assumed I would get a beta invite at some point, but not right away. Beta invites always come out in waves. Anyone who even knows what a Beta is knows that's how it works. The idea that everyone who bought an annual pass to gets in right away is absurd. "
EXACTLY THIS. 100% exactly this. Anyone who thought they were getting in on day 1 is just mad at Blizzard and picking apart wording to express their anger.
I mean, people have a right to be mad, but "I'm mad!" and "Blizz lied to me" are totally different things. How crazy do you have to be to complain that Blizz guaranteed you Day 1 access? It's just people complaining and taking it out on Blizz by picking apart wording. Also known as "This is why we can't have nice things."
Anyways, where's that pony? GC promised me one of those too! RAGE!
hollow leviathan Mar 23rd 2012 2:53PM
Actually...
http://www.wowhead.com/item=71137
Lemons Mar 23rd 2012 10:18PM
Blizz did lie to them...isn't that clear form the article? Mike Morheim said "in addition to getting Diablo III free you will also get guaranteed access into the next World of Warcraft expansion beta when it goes live." No one is picking his words apart...they're pretty clear.
I didn't really expect that Blizz would let all 1 million people in day 1, but they're Blizz, if anyone could do it it's them.
I'm sure there's a few people who though without a doubt, they were getting day 1 access, probably folks who don't know a lot about how these sorts of things work, but is that their fault? No! If Blizzard was going to do waves they should have made that ABUNDANTLY clear to their customers. Instead they promised day 1 access and then reneged on that promise. A real amatuer move imo.
I don't know why people always strive to be so accomodating to this multi-billion dollar company. They're a huge corperation that employs thousands of people, not your forgetful buddy, they have the ability to communicate effectively, and when they don't they should be called out on it.
Cerrena Mar 23rd 2012 12:19PM
I suspect people's memories are also playing games one them. I remember in the original annual pass announcement that a big deal was made of the fact that Annual pass holders would get DIII on the release day. I'm sure that influenced some people to believe the same was true about the beta access.
Personally, I'm happy to wait. As an avid companion collector, I'm probably best suited to testing the pet battles and they aren't available for testing yet. I'm happy to see that Blizzard seems to have made a real effort to get the media and bloggers access first. Although I don't know if that's because they are media and bloggers or if they were just the very first to rush to get their annual pass.
John Robinson Mar 23rd 2012 12:46PM
The only thing that the people complaining about are able to use for their argument is that 4 word phrase Mike said at Blizzcon - "when it goes live".
A certain group of people are quite adamant that there is only one way to "translate" that - that we will all get access to the beta the very second the servers are up. Unfortunately for those people, and for everyone else who has to hear about this ridiculousness, that is not the only way to read that phrase.
I get wet when it rains.
You can watch football when the new season starts.
Windows get all foggy when it's cold outside.
None of those uses of "when X happens" implies instant gratification.
Plainswander Mar 23rd 2012 12:18PM
I admit, I'm a little cranked at the really bad marketing language and spin control they're doing. A simple "um, there are WAY more of you than we expected, so we gotta do it in waves" would have headed a lot of this off at the pass.
That being said, I am a patient adult. If they say we'll get in, we'll get in. I just hope it's not one week before release.
Plainswander Mar 23rd 2012 12:21PM
edit: current spin control being much more to the tune of "what? we ALWAYS intended to do it this way.../shiftyeyes.... oh yeah, and we've always been at war with eastasia..."
Brett Porter Mar 23rd 2012 12:36PM
That's the thing, though... They've always done beta invites in waves. And they *did* say this time that we don't know when you'll.get in, but it will be done in waves as quickly as possible. They did let us know!
Plainswander Mar 23rd 2012 12:40PM
Brett: Yes, they did. In later posts and revisions, not in the initial offer. I'm not arguing the validity of what they did, just the way they did. It wasn't....cleanly done. Coulda been better.
Caz Mar 23rd 2012 1:01PM
1984 references FTW.
Plainswander Mar 23rd 2012 1:08PM
Thank god someone got that. I was starting to get a little worried. :)