The Queue: Beta questions make good Queue questions

Welcome back to The Queue, the daily Q&A column in which the WoW Insider team answers your questions about the World of Warcraft. Mathew McCurley (@gomatgo) will be your host today.
We had a lot of fun last night streaming the entire pandaren starting experience. Matthew Rossi, Anne Stickney, Alex Ziebart, and myself hopped on Mumble, fired up the live stream, and spent a few hours rampaging across the Wandering Isle. Witness all the wonder and spectacle of this special band of adventurers, with special guest "I'm Going to do Quests Whatever" Mike Sacco. See lots of pandaren emotes and animations, watch Alex actually having a fun time in WoW, and hear me say something funny with Rossi on occasion. Anne won't stop rolling. I think you'll have fun.
In the meantime, I'll do my best to answer as many questions about the practical, boots-on-the-ground beta as we have it now. It feels as if this first initial push is intended to be a systems test.
Revynn asked:
Are you locked to certain levels and zones like you were in the Cata beta or are people already trekking to 90?
The only content currently available for testing at this moment is 1-to-10 on the Wandering Isle and an incomplete (not too incomplete, however) 1-to-85 monk experience. Pandaria is not available yet, although many people have been trying to sneak on to the elusive continent.
I made an orc monk, and the starting experience was the same as the other classes. I did not find a monk trainer in the starter area yet, which doesn't bother me because you don't need to go back to a trainer to learn new skills anyway. However, it would be nice to have minimal monk presence in the old starting areas, just to feel like you belong. It is still beta, and this can and most likely will change.
keithcblack asked:
Have they sent beta invites out to Annual Pass holders yet? I haven't seem to have got mine yet.
Beta invites for the Annual Pass subscribers are going out in waves, with the initial tiny wave going out to some press, some Annual Pass subscribers, some opt-ins, etc., which what looks like a systems test. There is no way content that is currently available in the limited beta would accommodate the number of players ready to play because of the Annual Pass. Give it a week or so, and let's see what Blizzard says about the beta invite waves.
If we don't see the beta open up in terms of content available in the next couple of weeks, I would start to feel a little miffed and start up the angry train. Right now, the systems are coming online for the first public beta of the game.
ktphillips1217 asked:
So question, so i understand that monks use leather(or was it cloth till 40 then leather?) do the leather heirlooms work for them?
Monks only use leather armor, much like rogues.
gumpfanatic asked:
Has Blizzard said anything as to how they will explain Alliance pandas not being able to talk to Horde pandas? Do they not speak the same language together and grow up together on the turtle? Or am I completely wrong and opposing player pandas will be able to communicate with each other?
It is a gameplay decision, similar to why the Forsaken cannot speak common. This is one of those cases where the in-game explanation doesn't matter, because gameplay comes first.
recneps1337 asked:
what color are monks?
Monks are represented by a darker shade of green, almost like a forest green? Jade-like? I'm remembering back to my Crayola days. Hunters are a more muted green, whereas monks are a deeper shade of green. It's a different type of green.
slim1256 asked:
So, saw the video for this on Wowhead, and I have to ask:
Is it sad that, if I could choose any one feature from Mists to have right now, it would be AoE looting?
If there were any way to get AoE looting into the game earlier with one of the bigger updates before Mists of Pandaria launches, I would be a happy camper.
Filed under: The Queue






Reader Comments (Page 1 of 9)
Knob Mar 24th 2012 12:08PM
I thought the monk colour was actually a very light jade green, not a darker green?
Cephas Mar 24th 2012 12:24PM
No, it's a pretty dark jade green. Light green would be too close to the Hunter color. The color Wowhead is using here is at least pretty close, if not exactly right. http://www.wowhead.com/mists-of-pandaria-talent-calculator#n
Doug Mar 24th 2012 12:49PM
Another source with comparisons between classes.
http://www.wowpedia.org/Class_colors
Knob Mar 24th 2012 12:59PM
This is from the beta though: http://i.imgur.com/ra233.png
As you can see, it's much lighter.
mattmac123 Mar 24th 2012 1:15PM
its Teal
Hinalover Mar 24th 2012 1:18PM
After doing some digging on the Main Wow page CSS (the backend graphics coding) I came up with these two color code numbers:
Hunter - #aad372
Monk - #008467
You can check out the colors in this example
http://www.w3schools.com/html/tryit.asp?filename=tryhtml_colorhex
togaman5000 Mar 24th 2012 2:34PM
I found the color to be easily differentiated from hunters, for what it's worth. Hopefully it carries through to when I'm playing whack-a-mole with Vuhdo's health bars at 90.
Killik Mar 24th 2012 3:03PM
Yeah, don't want to heal a Hunter by mistake!
Pyromelter Mar 24th 2012 4:06PM
It's close to teal, but not exactly teal. Teal is a 50/50 split of blue and green, the monk color is 51% green, 40% blue.
The closest named color-to-hex-code conversion I found for the monk would be "dark jade."
The color noted on the beta screenshot is a much more brighter green.
terra_nouveau Mar 24th 2012 12:19PM
There was a blog post linked yesterday about how Garrosh being corrupted didn't make a lot of seense given how much he's grown as a character--servingwith honor, etc. that made an enormous amount of sense. As much as I dislike him the respect has certainly started to grow.
What are the chances that it'll be involuntary? Something like a circle of 13 men and 13 demons to force his mind to the dark side, and taking place in the new RFC?
Starsmore Mar 24th 2012 12:47PM
I knew it! Mazrim Taim was behind it all the time!
staffan.johansson Mar 24th 2012 1:41PM
I didn't see anything particularly *demonic* or fel-looking in the new RFC. I mean, sure, lots of fire and lava, but it's red fire, not green. You got Flamecallers, not Adepts or Warlocks. Lavahounds, not Felhounds. There's the swirling shadow thing with the shaman, but demons don't have the market cornered on shadow.
Given Garrosh's actions here and there in Cataclysm, he seems pretty determined not to start drinking the demon blood like his old man did. That was clearly a mistake. But what if he was cornered and was offered some form of elemental power? I mean, shamans deal with the elements, and that's good ol' orcish tradition, right? Couldn't hurt?
G0rehowl Mar 24th 2012 1:46PM
I'm guessing the Sha will have to do some thing with his corruption. In the MoP press release they said something about the Sha being able to possess people and with old Garroshs rage issue he seems like a perfect candidate for it. Hopefuly we just beat the crazy out of him rather than kill. Vengeance only fuels the sha
Bionic Radd Mar 24th 2012 2:47PM
They have 3 patches to explain it to us. I'm of the opinion that telling us about Garrosh's fate was just about the worst thing Metzen could have done. He has completely killed all suspense about where the story for WoW is going, which was the whole reason they said they weren't going to put a big bad on the box. Now, not only do we know what the monster at the end of the book is, but we are confused based on the current depiction of the character. I agree, the Garrosh currently standing in the middle of Orgrimmar does not deserve to be taken down.. How exciting would that big Varian quest chain have been if we hadn't know this how it was going to end?
Zhaph Mar 24th 2012 3:19PM
Mazrim Taim! Haha, that was so awesome!
Elowenn Mar 24th 2012 4:09PM
Hah! I love all the overt WoT references on this site. Glad to see I'm not the only reader around. :D
vocenoctum Mar 24th 2012 4:17PM
The thing to keep in mind with Garrosh's advancement of character, is how much of it is based on his current success. He led a successful Northrend campaign, he became warchief, he is leading the horde in battles near and far. He has accomplished much and can afford honor and the words of elders that he has come to respect.
Now picture his ass getting handed to him in a few battles, picture panda's siding with Taurens in trying to reign in the ecological excesses. Imagine that Sylvanas smacks your big strong orc and explains that she doesn't need to do what he says, she's more powerful than he is.
That'd be when he'll find a shadow council offer to empower him. All it'd take is a few of those dirty trolls on the altars and maybe some blood elven artifacts.
Oh hey, and drink this flaming green stuff. It's called Demon Blood, but that's just a fancy name for Powerade.
Suzaku Mar 25th 2012 3:31AM
Here's how I'd like to see it go down, if they insist on corrupting him:
Garrosh isn't so much being corrupted as he is willingly corrupting himself to temporarily gain the power he believes will be needed to dominate the Alliance.
He does so by tapping into the very same demonic powers that his father once used, with the full knowledge that his father was able to free the cursed orcs from the demonic bloodlust by killing Mannoroth.
Once he's won his war, he intends to betray the warlocks and demons, slaughter them, and free the cursed from demonic influence.
At least, that's his intent at the start of the foolish venture.
Imnick Mar 24th 2012 12:16PM
Have EU invites gone out yet or only US? I have heard conflicting reports
TheWizard Mar 24th 2012 12:51PM
EU invites are out and the first wave has been sent. Just sit tight, wait for the next wave and hope you get in!