Blue Posts: Ghostcrawler returns saying no to warlock tanking spec

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)

3-26-2012 @ 11:32PM

kapulani.koa said...

Re: data mining.

Is it really data mining if people are, you know, playing the beta and getting the results described? It's not a matter of people looking in the data files and finding out that there are all these other things. They're playing the game. The warlock tank works (too well, right now). It's not like nobody has seen it functioning in game.

3-27-2012 @ 9:45AM

nosoup4u76 said...

Well, the fact that it's the first couple weeks of the open invites to beta make it a fairly good chance that the finished product in LIVE will look vast different from what is up there now in Beta.

I'm cool with people getting exited about Mists, I know that I am, but remember to hold yourselves in check folks.

I mean, did the druids out there really think that Mangle was going to continue to do 3000% damage or that some of the ported tunes who had 10x their base stats were going to be the same? Of course not. Am I making a really big leap in connecting those obvious bugs to this glyph? YES. The whole point is, it's beta. Take everything you see and experience with a grain of salt the size

Add your comments

Your comments:

Remember me

E-Mail me when someone replies to this comment

Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.

When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.

To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.