Also on AOL
- Autos
- Technology
- Lifestyle
- Gaming
- Finance
- Entertainment on AOL
- Lifestyle on AOL
- Sports on AOL
- Travel on AOL
- More on AOL
Featured Galleries
Joystiq
© 2013 AOL Inc. All rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks | AOL A-Z HELP | About Our Ads

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
3-29-2012 @ 8:19AM
Bakzhar said...
I want the option to choose! Different kind of dwarves (Wildhammer, Bronzebeards, Dark Iron) with tattoes and all. Different kind of Orcs (Green fel ones, and those red Garroshy types)
Forsaken that are human, and dead elvies!
They had added all this, I would give blizzard all my money.
Reply
3-29-2012 @ 9:09AM
Killik said...
Now, being able to play dead elvis would guarantee my subscription for some considerable time.
3-29-2012 @ 9:51AM
Joe said...
Yes. Sub-races was my early prediction for Mists (that is, before it was announced). I was wrong; Blizzard went with pandas, but I still think it's a great idea.
Sub-races give people lots of new and interesting choices. But Blizzard could still keep their development costs down by making all sub-races use the same skeleton and animations.
I predict it (again) for the next expansion after Mists.
3-29-2012 @ 4:13PM
Elmo said...
While I would like it I think it would unbalance the racial representatives a lot.
take Dwarves for instance, they are mostly Bronzebeards in lore, the other 2 races only recently returned to Ironforge.
yet I feel a lot of players would prefer the tatooed Wildhammer or the Red eyed Dark Iron over the more bland Bronzebeards.
This especially goes for sub-races that really look different like Taunka, Broken Draenei, Undead Elves or Forest Trolls.
And what about races that don't have visually different subraces like Humans, Night Elves or Worgen?