Skip to Content
3-30-2012 @ 9:10AM
This is the best article written yet. Had me laughing the while way through. I don't think blizzard understands, warlocks don't want green fire as a choice, warlocks want it as a standard! To separate them moreso from the hated mages... And youknow, mere mortals as well
3-30-2012 @ 10:19AM
LOL@Mages is what I say. They're just jelly that they're not as cool as us warlocks!
3-30-2012 @ 10:37AM
They don't though, I've seen Warlocks who are glad that it is not going to become standard every time the issue is brought up. Hell, one of them is in my guild.
3-30-2012 @ 12:41PM
Warlocks NEED green fire ... it so epitomizes the jealousy in their souls (do warlocks even HAVE souls?) that they will NEVER be as AWESOME as any mage.
3-30-2012 @ 3:29PM
@noel:Warlocks have souls. They just used to belong to other people.
3-30-2012 @ 6:51PM
As a mea culpa to warlocks for the whole "green fire" fiasco, Blizzard has confirmed that they are building a home in which all warlocks shall be happy and comfortable.Congrats locks, Hot Topic is coming to the Drag! All stores will also be firmly fitted with trash receptacles aplenty for you to discard your used eye-liners. Let the rejoicing begin! Who needs green fire when you can all get what you really want...that awesome t-shirt with your favorite new emo band!
First time? A confirmation email will be sent to you after submitting.
Members enter your username and password.
Enter your AOL or AIM screenname and password.
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.