Skip to Content

WoW Insider has the latest on the Mists of Pandaria!
  • shiplore
  • Member Since Jun 14th, 2007

Are you shiplore? If So, Login Here.

WoW92 Comments
Massively1 Comment

Recent Comments:

Maintenance day loot from {WoW}

May 18th 2010 11:08AM Mount please!

Maintenance day loot from {WoW}

Apr 13th 2010 8:09AM I'd like to win please!

The Colosseum: Rheek of Blackrock {WoW}

Nov 17th 2009 5:35PM Nice to have an interview with an arena player where they don't sound like a complete tool-box. This guys seems thoughtful and nice.

Pandaren pet "sold out" on Blizzard store [Updated] {WoW}

Nov 11th 2009 11:28AM It's gotta be a database issue no biggie,

They have to put an "on hand" amount that's a real actual number, the Point of sale software manages the process and each sale subtracts one.. it ran out faster than they expected so they have to add more. or conversely they need to precode the redemption codes and that db ran out of numbers... their tables might only be able to hold x# (because they never want their physical inventory higher than X...etc..

Patch 3.3 PTR: Patch notes updated {WoW}

Nov 3rd 2009 7:56PM I don't get what the confusion is..

Need does always win over greed. right? How is stating "and will always beat those that choose Greed or Disenchant." So I'm wary." any different that how it works other than the "or disenchant" part...

Patch 3.3 PTR: Ghostcrawler explains Paladin changes {WoW}

Oct 28th 2009 2:31PM @ Phillip...condescension?

Please Blizzard and GC are anything but. IF you start off your arguement by saying "Die in a fire" you deserve to be ridiculed. I can't recall one well thought out post that was ever responded to with scorn from any Blizz. YOU troll or say stupid things and act like a 13 year old brat, you'l be treated like one.. not really shocking. As for the Blizzcon jokes? You might want to lighten up.. most people who are pally-mains find it funny.

The Queue: Questions, comments, complaints... {WoW}

Sep 16th 2009 11:14AM I have to disagree with Pyril. it's not a PVP's a PVE fight with limited aggro tables that reset quickly. it's all about dispelling, decursing (not standing in fire) and staying alive. It's not really even a healing fight the key for healers is to stay away from the Rogue and Pally. Your tanks have to be good at taunting, your range DPS needs to misdirect, sic pets and lay traps.

My 10-man is pretty bad tbh, we haven't downed Yogg yet, but handed champions once everyone stopped complaining about "having to PVP" if you've ever PVP'd as a holy priest, you'll know it's not the same thing.

The fight is all about using *more* of your class abilities than usual sure, but (Fade, Scream, polymorph, dispel, decurse) aren't just pvp talents.

15 Minutes of Fame: Members only {WoW}

Aug 25th 2009 3:01PM @ ala
I addressed this previously, but it's a blog with an editorial position. They don't have to Follow Steven Brill to the letter of journalistic ethics, but they do obviously have an editorial position that is evident by the content they've produced.

15 Minutes of Fame: Members only {WoW}

Aug 25th 2009 2:32PM @Bill
Fair enough, I probably haven't explained my main issue was how it was presented. I don't need them them berate but that was a - I hope you would agree -- bit fluffy in terms of interview.

I think it should be covered, a lot of the "look out for x scam" articles on here have ereally protected me as a player.

I'm not arguing we shouldn't talk about things we don't like or disagree with, (and I can see how it may have come across that way, for that inelegance, I apologize) but I disliked the way in which it was presented, Lisa P. posted later that it's a misconception that this feature was designed to show just positive things, but it's name, and branding make that jump pretty easy.

As for the tacit endorsement/immaturity, I was actually thinking of for example - hotel parking lots where they always post "Not responsible for broken into vehicles" there are actually a lot of cases where they are responsible, just claiming a right doesn't establish it, which is also a little off -point here, but in relation to that being the ONLY critical part of the piece or opposing view point it didn't seem like enough.