| Blog | Comments |
|---|---|
| WoW | 5 Comments |
Recent Comments:
Blue poster Belfaire explains Blizzard's stance on multiboxing {WoW}
Mar 13th 2008 10:32AM I have my suspicions that Blizzard employees regularily dual/tri/quad/etc box. They claim their 'leet tech skillz' make it not automation.
To each their own!
Blue poster Belfaire explains Blizzard's stance on multiboxing {WoW}
Mar 13th 2008 9:57AM I just thought though - I would definitely like being able to do some daily quests 5 at a time! Cha-Ching!
2.4 invades the background downloader {WoW}
Mar 13th 2008 9:51AM I'd like to see Blizz gain some balls and not get feared by all the QQing shamans or warlocks.
Blue poster Belfaire explains Blizzard's stance on multiboxing {WoW}
Mar 13th 2008 9:47AM It doesn't require skill to do this. What would be the major complaint is the fact that these guys are defeating the purpose of LFG/LFM. L2GET FRIENDS.
But mo' money = mo' money. Why care? Does anyone have an experiences with MultiBoxers in Arena? Is it viable?
I'm probably just jealous because I can't convince myself to shell out the extra money just to flash my epeen around to my guildmates.
Encrypted Text: Raiding as a Rogue, Part II {WoW}
Mar 13th 2008 9:42AM If they're nerfing Combat Swords plz to be buffing daggers. It makes most sense that rogues would get most damage from daggers, not swords. I agree that if you wanna play extra-attack-swords just roll a warrior. The rogues have been ignored far too long to not get some buffs that put us in competition with the OP enhancement shamans, warlocks, flamepalming mages or dps kitties.
