Skip to Content

WoW Insider has the latest on the Mists of Pandaria!
  • Clint
  • Member Since Mar 14th, 2008

Are you Clint? If So, Login Here.

BlogComments
WoW80 Comments
Massively2 Comments

Recent Comments:

Guild Season 2 DVD preorder available now, out 5/19 {WoW}

Apr 23rd 2009 9:40AM @Gessilea

ha, good rebuttal.

AbleGamer talks to Blizz about 3.1 accessibility {WoW}

Apr 1st 2009 10:02AM lol, invisible spell effects.

I remember doing Nightbane on my laptop with all video settings at minimum. I never even saw the 'fire' on the ground til I got a new computer - just knew, 'dont stand in the middle, switch sides occasionally'

Ready Check: Ulduar and Burnout {WoW}

Mar 30th 2009 9:41AM Is it QQ if enough people agree?

The game has most definitely taken a turn towards 'accessibility' in Wrath. Some may view this as a good thing, but myself and many others view it as a bad thing. I am merely a middle of the pack raider that enjoys challenge -- no server firsts here. But farming the same content for months (and months) on end because it was too easy to clear in the first place is not fun to me.

I sincerely hope it takes my 'average' guild more than 4 or 5 raid lockouts to clear Ulduar. Hard modes are not as interesting as new content. They make people... bored.

Making flasks in Patch 3.1 to give double the reward {WoW}

Mar 24th 2009 9:54AM The flasks last half as long, so demand will increase. I don't think demand will double though. My guess... about a 20% net decrease in price.

Insider Trader: Patch 3.1, profits and preparation {WoW}

Mar 16th 2009 9:50AM @Adamanthis

Good counter point. The current 'gender neutral' way of writing/speaking has always been unnecessarily confusing and reinforced centuries old inequalities. Although I am not yet convinced speaking in the 'artificial' conjunctions (policewoman, craftswoman, etc) is the best way to go about it. In fact it doesn't really address the issue of not having a sufficient 'gender neutral' term.

Etymology is facinating.

Victory from the jaws of defeat {WoW}

Mar 13th 2009 9:57AM Google translate is cool.

FF: My first 吗 ?
bod: yes, and you are dumb.

Can anyone verify if this is correct (and what the missing character is)?

The Care and Feeding of Warriors: Scarce Change on the PTR {WoW}

Feb 27th 2009 4:47PM I lol'd. Yup, this is a blog. They are -supposed- to be biased and opinionated.

QQ with substance :-)

The Care and Feeding of Warriors: Scarce Change on the PTR {WoW}

Feb 27th 2009 4:41PM Hmm, idk, the developers at blizzard are people like you and me. They are gamers that have a kickass job. Sure they did some schoolin' to get there, but they aren't geniuses.

It would be a lot of work to rebalance ALL the trees around a baseline TG. I think it could work. Seriously. But Rossi is correct in saying it won't happen.

I know we are -promised- changes for 3.1. But as time continues to slip by it seems that warriors are the black sheep that Blizz doesn't want to address. Time will tell.

At least as prot I'm second best at all my tanking duties.

No more ghetto-hearthing in patch 3.1 {WoW}

Feb 24th 2009 4:55PM Aren't there some 8k gold rings that will teleport you to Dalaraan? I think I read something about them, then /drooled, then /ate red pill and forgot about something I will never be able to buy.

Undocumented glyph changes in 3.1 {WoW}

Feb 24th 2009 3:11PM Plus T7 4-set... what is that... a 22% uptime. Pretty sweet.