Jun 16th 2011 9:34AM @Milf Biggenson Shame on you, sir... crack it open! You won't be disappointed!
Nov 2nd 2010 12:25PM If they limited their online video content solely to a subscription like HBO, then they might have something (hint: Playstation Plus?). Instead, I get asked to purchase individual episodes, which I won't bother to do because the content just isn't there yet.
Aug 12th 2009 12:14PM Why are you answering questions about Blizzard's way of handling something when it is still a rumor?
You a perpetuating something as fact and certainty when in fact (and certainty) you don't know what the @#&* the next expansion will have, including new races.
Nice of you to link your own story in the answer as "proof", too.
Aug 10th 2009 3:54PM Right. Which is why I started off my statement as to the *TITLE* of the article. It would have been more appropriate to write "New races leaked for the next expansion" or something like that. But we have a two-fer in that we get two rumors rolled into one!
Aug 10th 2009 2:51PM @Adam: As to the title of this article, this little snippet from another article YOU wrote and posted not 3 hours prior to this one (http://www.wow.com/2009/08/10/the-queue-wherein-the-queue-has-as-much-consistency-as-smodcast/):
"When will Blizzard release Cataclysm info?"
Well, first thing's first. There has been no official announcement yet that Cataclysm is related to WoW or anything.
Aug 10th 2009 2:36PM @Robert M.:
They won't even be close to troll populations, but much more like DKs and Blood Elves. Even Draenei have high populations (although not as high as BEs Horde-side.)
Aug 10th 2009 2:31PM I assume you feel the same way as I do that this is a horrible decision. I don't have any "better ideas", so don't you trolls jump down my throat, but it still doesn't mean that Worgen and Goblins (if it is true) would be a good idea. I'm completely happy with the number of races in the game as it stands, to be honest.