Sep 23rd 2008 8:52AM lol most of these comments on here have been much more thought out and articulated than the actual article. it really does just seem like the guy doesnt personally like the leader and thinks highly of himself. the advice of the article is probably not the best aproach in all seriousness. the purpose of it seems to be for the sake of rhetoric and, as someone previously stated, page hits. hopefully the person who wrote in will read through these comments and heed some of the thoughtful and concerned advice by people who have gone through the same things instead of attempting a childish and deceptive takeover of a guild that, as they admitted, have no history in. i feel for u, guild leaders!