Jun 6th 2009 7:12PM heh, kinda backwards you're giving him popularity by putting it on WoW.com and telling him so, but also loosened his lips and he spilled the beans in a big way to the inner workings of the hacking/scamming market.
Useful information for anyone.
Jun 4th 2009 11:49PM Tribual would win this.
Same thing as the rest said, one bad rift spawn and he'd be killing Brann himself (they spawn all over with no set points), not to mention the rifts that aren't in the back with Brann may get nuked by the phase 3 eye beam o' death, and hence be killing it, the adds that are hanging around near it, and possibly breaking him out of immunity to get pounded on some more with Dark matters and adds.
Finally, The tribunal was built by the Titans and Watchers themselves. The titans are responsible for creating the Dragon Aspects and pretty much Azeroth in general. Anomalus may be strong enough to beat the Blues, but he has no chance against a security system of the gods. Also, he's gonna eventually weaken being out of his element (neutral playing field = No giant rift in Nexus feeding him the energy to keep him going).
May 20th 2009 2:42AM I actually thought I came to the wrong site for a moment.
I'm not much liking this new change, the site seems to put a much greater load then wowinsider.com ever did, when I scroll down it seems to tear.
It also seems that the add comment button has gone missing...
Please tell me that's a design oversight or I'm gonna be turned off from reading here..
May 13th 2009 2:55AM We do it like this:
10 man: roll for loot, highest roll gets
25 man: EPGP
25 man's shards goes to our most constant, best healer (which in our case was a shaman), once he finishes, it trickles down the list until our least on, worst healer gets it (if he even gets that far, that is)
Once we start full-clearing ulduar 25, I'm pretty sure the healers will be rocking their maces in a week or two of getting their 1st shard.
May 1st 2009 2:52AM once it ended up in his possession by GM means, it became available to players.
ergo, Section 1 is null. He didn't hack the game maliciously to aquire it.
Section 3 pretty much covers anything blizzard doesn't like. If they think DKs are contrary to the game suddenly, Section 3 would let them ban all DKs.
Mar 29th 2009 2:14PM Why a Holy Paladin?
You can reach into a barrel of holy paladins and find a handful of ones that top all 3 categories, especially with a DEATH KNIGHT as a partner.
Review someone who really had to work hard, like a Feral Druid, A Enhance Shaman, A arms warrior, a ROGUE (since they are rather low in representation atm).
Stop giving glory to the damn FotMs..
Nov 15th 2008 11:37AM poast
Nov 15th 2008 11:34AM saweeet
Nov 13th 2008 10:34AM SWAAAAG....
Nov 12th 2008 5:26PM gimme