Skip to Content

WoW Insider has the latest on the Mists of Pandaria!
  • zoshk
  • Member Since Feb 7th, 2009

Are you zoshk? If So, Login Here.

BlogComments
WoW9 Comments

Recent Comments:

The 25 most evil achievements finale, part 2 {WoW}

May 6th 2010 9:15PM Unlike inter-faction griefing, there's no "PvP solution" to your own teammates' screwing you over, and the achievement does nothing to encourage PvP-phobic players to get more experience

aren't priests getting 'life grip'? oh that'll be fun

Trial account restrictions and the 30 percent problem {WoW}

Feb 15th 2010 10:30AM @jealouspirate

while i have no problem with getting all the skills on day 1 for some classes...I will also probably not try other classes I don't already have a decent level alt in.
It's a bit daunting to a new player (to the game) to have to read through all the abilities and learn them. and if they wanted to pvp...don't even get started on keybinds. Most likely will push away new players more than attract them just for that reason.

and I know i wouldn't feel safe for a completely new player to be tanking a raid for me, probably wouldn't even give them a chance to prove themselves

I'm pretty sure there have been games with no 'level's in the traditional sense, but rpgs generally have some kind of progression...getting rid of it completely will push away a lot of people, and activision blizzard wants their $$$, so while it is always nice to push for more skill than gear being so drastic is unlikely to happen

Realm Status: Coming back online {WoW}

Dec 8th 2009 11:14PM Darkspear US world server just died

Arthas: Rise of the Lich King giveaway {WoW}

Apr 15th 2009 4:51PM rawr!
go go go

Rumor: The9 to lose WoW in China {WoW}

Mar 24th 2009 5:34PM Quoted:
Total Characters: 6,833,758

characters, not paying accounts
still don't think china has 7mil though...


on another note

那不好 is more like "that isn't good"

the 件 in "那件不可能好吧" isn't need, its a measure word but there is no noun for it to refer to directly (i know thing/event is implied...but if you want to have 件 you'd still have to write it out)
那不可能好 sounds better
or you can say 那不可能是好事 "that can't be a good thing"

you can also say
肯定不好 "definitely not good"

Ask a Lore Nerd: Speculative speculation {WoW}

Mar 23rd 2009 10:27PM regarding why the lich king doesn't just rez people like illidan and kael'thus

even if he could get to them, rez them from really far away...he might not want to

people with strong wills have a possibility of breaking away from his control, and he would not like to deal with an undead version of illidan...but think of the possibilities for a new raid

Ask a Lore Nerd: Speculative speculation {WoW}

Mar 23rd 2009 10:23PM it'd be harder to get a frost wrym...as they are in service of the lich king
you can randomly grab a proto drake from the wild and tame it...good luck doing that with one of the lich king's minions

Ulduar on the 3.1 PTR: Kologarn {WoW}

Mar 11th 2009 11:09PM i'm sure that if it was possible to target more than just the arms people on the ptr would have noticed...think about it...you press tab...goes from body to arm...press tab again...other arm...tab ..back to body
thats it

the idea of the fight seems to be eating up the damage from the arms while attacking the boss...there shouldn't be any repeat of arms or any such thing

attacking different parts of a boss can certainly be in the future....most certainly not for this boss

What 3.1 means for PvP part III {WoW}

Feb 7th 2009 4:16PM @joey_da_bubbles

getting a shard while draining w/o killing would not make grinding faster at all
in the time it takes to cast soulfire, which has been in game from the start before the qq, i could have tagged 2 mobs and be moving on to the third. in effect, using shards while grinding will only slow me down.

personally, this change is only useful for raids in certain situations
and remove some peoples qualms about using those abilities in pvp

and i see no reason why mages shouldn't be allowed to port w/o runes...hasn't blizz been removing reagents left and right?