Sep 13th 2011 5:06PM That's right. This is when they put in the keyring.
Oh keyring how I miss you.
Jun 11th 2011 1:20PM As a pally tank threat stats are completely useless to me. I get all of my hit from items I've retorted away from hit/expertise and the free 10 expertise from SoT.
Gemming, reforging, or enchanting into threat stats is a waste unless you are a DK.
May 31st 2011 10:26PM "If a player wins a Need roll under the Need Before Greed system on a Bind on Equip item, the item will become Soulbound to that player. The item will remain unbound if won via a Greed roll."
Apr 29th 2011 8:57PM I've always looked at it like this. We are wearing a robe over te actual plate armor.
Paladins are just badass priests essentially. Makes sense that we'd keep te robe even after putting on all that plate.
Apr 27th 2011 8:15AM I took a year off when I was deployed to Iraq, and then the next year just as I was getting into Ulduar (I was the MT for the #1 horde raiding guild on my server) I ended up getting burnt out at the same time I got a puppy. It took RL friends talking about Cata to get me back in about 2 weeks before it came out.
Ahh how I missed it.
Apr 7th 2011 4:55AM You are being rewarded with shorter queue times.
As it is I tank one random a day, mostly with my guild unless I can't get a group together. I then run a random pug and switch to level an alt or work on rep for these exact items.
If I get a chance to get a mount or noncombat pet for dealing with jackass DPS in pugs.... Well I'd run more than the one until I decide it's just not worth it.
Mar 28th 2011 2:11PM I already use 1password, Civ 5, VMWare Fusion.
I'm in this for TechTool pro
Feb 7th 2011 7:56PM @Ronin
This is in fact a news site, it just happens to be news about World of Warcraft. The graffiti was related to World of Warcraft, hence the coverage. From their about us page:
"WoW Insider is Azeroth’s largest blog and information site, covering the latest news, analysis and opinion from all around the World of Warcraft."
If WoW Insider isn't a news publication, then what is it?
And yes the comments are for commenting on the article. Wouldn't your time maybe be better spent actually commenting on the substance of the article instead of complaining about its existence?
I see the post we are commenting about to be more of an opinion piece, rather than a straight-laced serious article. I again want to say that you should feel free to comment on the behavior of the person who defaced the sign, but I just don't understand the attacks on Elizabeth.