Feb 25th 2010 1:21PM thanks for reading or not.
I have said warriors are hydrids in my post. If the part that my warrior should not be doing the same dps as a mage/lock/rogue/hunter was enough of a hint.
And I brought this up because this buff to warriors having much less stam then pallys in high level gear.
And still pallys are most likely the best tank even after this. And they do comparable dps to warriors. And even to go more far they have the biggest heals in raids.
You can't have a hybrid class excell in every roll. It will just make everyone flock to one class like.........idk how it is now? How on most servers pallys make up around 12-16% of the player population at 80? Even more then the Dk's that start at level 56 when leaving the level area. Hell it is almost impossible to do a 10 man without 2 pallys in it. Just because they are the most used class.
And this is why you can not make hybrids excel too high. However this could of been a plan from blizzard to make pallys a powerful force in lich king. Where pallys are known to be stronger against the undead and against a pally that went against the order.
If anything it is most likely a great idea to make pallys a strong force during a expansion. On a lore point of view. Game wise it is not smart at all.
Hell maybe in Cata. shaman's become OP all of a sudden? And it will fit the lore perfectly.
Feb 25th 2010 1:17AM In short.
If a pally did more dps then a warlock. The game is partly broken
The warlocks only roll is dps. Whats the point of being a lock if a class that can tank/heal/dps is doing better then your one roll.
I understand that they are trying to work out a hybrid tax. But the numbers are not balanced at all. Sadly the hybrid tax should be more then 5%.
The game has serious balance issues. Mostly because of qq for a hybrid class doing less damage in raids.
In all honestly my warrior should never be able to dps close to the amount a mage/hunter/lock/rogue and put out. Or should any other class.
The margin has to be bigger to maintain balance
Feb 25th 2010 1:10AM mmmmm mmm
Man this is good. About time also....
Most tanks are measured by how much health they got. And well....pallys with the 14% more stam always towered over warriors with a little 6%
Plus in all honestly on a lore point of view. Aren't warriors supposed to have more endurance then pallys?
Even in D and D settings warrior arch types are supposed to be the guys having the most endurance.
And in D and D history pallys have always been a support class. That is till 4th edition when they can be a defender.
But even then they are no where near the power of endurance of a warrior. Mostly for BALANCE issues because the pally is a HYBRID class. And making it excel in even 1 roll compared to others will make it way too op
Maybe blizzard can learn a thing or two about dungeons and dragons. In short(actually make a hybrid tax exist maybe?)
Making hybrids excel in any 1 roll is a no no
Feb 23rd 2010 12:31PM Yes....it is so expensive.......
My sister makes online animated videos at times. And all she really needed was a mic and Skype to talk with people. The mic cost a good 20-30 bucks. And Skype is free. So are you serious?
It is called, LETS GET HUGE HITS BECAUSE WE USED A POPULAR SONG FOR OUR VIDEO.
Now ppl that look for lady GAGA on youtube which has anywhere from 5 million hits and more will see this as well
And that is most likely the main reason.....
Feb 22nd 2010 2:15PM Oh look.....
Another Blood elf music video with mediocre music timing
Feb 19th 2010 7:30PM To Sleutel
I think you failed to see my point.
I am able to collect threat. And if I wanted to AOE tank like butter and actually do more dps then most pure dps classes in trash pulls I would do a different tree.
My point is the warrior should not have to count on so many different sets of armor to do the same job other tanks classes can do with their own 1 set of armor. And we should not have to re glyph just to match the aoe ability of other classes. (make cleave hit 3 targets without a glyph please)
Yes that is a no brainier that those are your best friends but a class should not be so gear dependent. This is why warriors were so overpowered or so weak depending on gear. This is why I as one could raceroll everything in vanilla as a warrior with grand marshal gear.
And it is also why it is the worst class with not so top end gear.
Sorry if you faield to see the main point
Feb 19th 2010 7:18PM I think blizzard should be more concerned in how every smart hunter has a wolf......
IDK.....maybe make its ability given to all pets of the same tree?
That way hunters don't have to stick with a wolf for max dps so we can see some different pets in raids and cities.
Feb 19th 2010 7:14PM Mages have been faceroll since day one in both pvp/pve......nothing new here
>Raided with a mage in vanilla and BC. Got bored of the faceroll in lich king
Feb 19th 2010 4:13PM As I get more geared it becomes much harder to tank heroics
I just don't get enough rage at all. They hit me like pansey's and I don't get enough rage.
I start wearing some dps plate gear to help me out but its not cutting it. And too be honest I don't think this was the design for warrior AOE tanking.
Actually it seems like we were not meant to AOE tank and it was put in at the last minute.
I am still able to keep threat but just barely with great dps with me. I shouldn't have to wear dps plate and to have 2 prot specs to aoe/single tank at full strength. (And I don't)
Ya we may be the most popular tanks, but thats no reason not to buff us. People will always play warriors. Been a warrior since vanilla and tried every class at 80. Nothing comes close to the feel/effort it takes to be great as a warrior.
Hell I don't even play my 80 frost mage anymore for pvp because of how faceroll it is.
Bottom line blizzard should stop looking at charts and just make things at equal grounding.
Feb 18th 2010 6:20PM If you didn't know leroy Jenkins was set up and fake.
They actually messed up several times trying to make the video because they were laughing too much.
Most the time they started to laugh when they came out with this crunch number thing. Which I never heard before in my life.
So now that you know its fake.......isn't it less funny now?