Mar 23rd 2012 2:59PM Garrosh being corrupted by an old god does not inspire me to take him down in a full all out siege/war -- it makes me pity him instead.
Mar 23rd 2012 2:32PM What I want is for Garrosh not to be corrupted by Old Gods.
I want Alliance to take Garrosh because he's a big threat, and I want Horde to take down Garrosh because he's detrimental to the Horde in the long run -- burning through resources, engaging in a land ware with Russia in the middle of Winter, something like that.
Garrosh becoming corrupted is a scapegoat that makes me wanna pity Garrosh instead, because some Old God tentacle touched him inappropriately.
Mar 5th 2012 8:38AM The whole strategic healing paradigm is what pushed me out of healing, I shelved my resto shaman and my resto druid for good.
And it's too late in the expansion for me to give a damn and pick up healing again.
Dec 9th 2011 10:41AM @Dante
Yeah, but Paragon, Method and Ensidia have been going around saying that the real race doesn't start until they're in the mix. In other words, the banned guilds have been trying to devalue the accomplishments of those that are currently in the race.
Yes, it's a legitimate win, it should be, but the european guilds are going "Well, you can't call yourself the best if you didn't beat the previous champion"
Aug 20th 2010 9:28AM I have the impression that while the old Improved Devotion Aura affected all healing received by people affected by our aura regardless of who casts the heal spell, the case is not the same for Protector of the Innocent, where only -your- heal spells gets the extra boost.
"increases the amount healed on any target affected by any of your Auras by 6%."
"Increases -your- healing by 3% on allies affected by Devotion Aura".
Jul 7th 2010 4:43PM After Bashiok, I'm sure Blizzard was deluged with "if you post my real name, I quit" statements from employees.
Which, of course, makes Blizzard's implementation not just stupid, but hypocritical as well. They apparently recognize the hazards associated with the violation of privacy, but still believe that you shouldn't have the same rights as, say, their employees.
Jul 6th 2010 3:40PM Who didn't see this coming?
Apr 30th 2010 4:36PM The only thing I don't like is that there's people that only participate in the PvE aspect of the game - if they want access to the cataclysm daily hub, they will automatically be flagged for PvP. I think it's rather punishing for 'em.
Apr 26th 2010 12:16PM My only qualm is this. I raid both ICC10 and ICC25, and I do so with two different groups of peoeple -- and I have fun doing so, but now Blizz wants to make me choose between 'em even tho the social aspect of the raiding is what makes our groups fun to play with.
This will kill guild alliances as well...
Apr 15th 2010 2:19PM quote from Ghostcrawler regarding BoSanc:
Kings and Might can just be raid wide. There should be no need to target individuals. We're trying to make sure there isn't a circumstance where one dude would prefer the opposite buff to everyone else.
Bo Sanc could just be Kings with an extra mana component (for the paladin). We're also considering making it a passive that gives the paladin mana and provides the 3% damage reduction buff raid-wide which is currently brought by Renewed Hope (the Disc talent).
You might want to add it to your protection paladin analysis