Apr 16th 2011 12:42PM Frostmourne doesn't automatically take souls. Arthas chooses who's soul he wants to take. For example, in W3, Arthas kills Gavinrad (one of the first member of the Knights of the Silver Hand) but chooses to let him die without taking his soul. I found this odd because he took Uther's soul, but not Gavinrad.
Plus, Illidan wasn't killed, just wounded really badly and i think Arthas was pretty spent after all those battles :)
Jan 17th 2011 9:25AM Actually, I DO know what Net Neutrality is about. What you do not understand is that when a law is passed "protecting" something, it also opens the door for that law to be changed later on. What this post is concerned about is already starting to happen. Just look at the new rules the FCC put into place on 12/21/2010. All under the name of Net Neutrality.
Why do we need to pass a law protecting free speech on the internet when our free speech is already protected in the Bill of Rights?
Answer: So that people in positions of power have an avenue to restrict those freedoms later on down the line.
Everytime a law is passed, our general liberties are decreased.
Jan 14th 2011 4:58PM Net Neutrality is nothing more than control on speech. The internet is by far the greatest form of free speech not only for our country, but the world. Any form of control or limitation only opens the door to more and more restrictions. I understand that there are plenty of people out there that would love to silence opposition to their own views, competition, etc. But if one side can be silenced or quieted, that means your side can as well.
Competition is good, debate is good. If you can't produce a product that is superior to your competition, then go back to the drawing board and make one. If more people disagree with you than agree, then back your views up with more facts or you just may be wrong.
And just a side note on equality...impossible. We are all differnet and have differnet abilities and talents that make us unique. Some people are simply better in some things than you, while you are better in some things than them. Its just the way things are and to try and make it so that we are all the same destroys who we are. You are unique, celebrate that. Don't try to be like someone else. And more importantly, don't take from others in the name of equality. We can't all be equally in happy in life, but we can be equally miserable. There isn't enough money to all be rich, but we can all be equally poor. Equality is a tool of the power hungry.
Nov 23rd 2010 9:53AM @Eddy
DDT is harmless, even to children. What side effects are you talking about? The basis for your arguement is false, do you not realize this? It really is a miracle chemical. It has no effect on people, so how does spraying it to kill insects that transmit disease a lifestyle change? Its not and so your arguement has no weight. I lifestyle change actually affects the way we live. Imagine that you had to keep your heat lower in the winter in the name global warming. You would probably have to wear layers of clothes or wear your coat inside. That changes the way you live now. Some would say small change, but where do we draw the line?
You want it to be illegal to use resources as we see fit. And where does this authority come from? What gives any man the power to dictate what another does with their property? No man should EVER have that kind of power!
With how corrupt government is, do you really think they will be fair in the limits everyone gets? What does government run now that is efficient and truly fair? Besides the military, the answer is nothing...
You are not championing the enviroment, you are wanting people to give up their freedoms. And you are doing it in the name of lies. Whats more disturbing is you don't even try to defend the loss of lives because of enviromental "causes". WAKE UP MAN!
As for you other comments about war, art funding, and feeding the poor...I understand you are trying to add weight to your arguement, but you are really all over the place and trying to take this into other tangents which are separate issues on their own. Instead, you should defend your ideology because that is what we are really debating here.
I champion liberty while you are championing tyranny.
Let me leave you with this thought and please think on it. (Man is imperfect and therefore anything man creates will also be imperfect. Wouldn't the best way to live in a civil society be in one which lets each person live their own life and meet their own needs to the best of their abilities?) Because how can any one man or group of people know better than you how you should live your life?
Nov 22nd 2010 10:57AM @Gizen
You're a lil off topic. I'm arguing the man-made global warming is a hoax. You are trying to twist that into me saying that polution does not exists. What person in their right mind wants more polution? And i'm not sure where you live, but where i live i already breath clean air and drink clean water. If we already have this, what more are you asking for? Every "solution" the eviromentalists come up with all end with the same result: dead humans and wealth redistribution.
Lifestyle changes? I choose the way I live, not you or any government. See I live in a free country that embraces liberty (although that has become quite the fight as of late). I drive a sports car that uses lots of gas because i enjoy it, in the summer i crank up the AC, in the winter i turn up the heat, and i pay for it with my hard earned $$. How you live your life is your choice, but you have no right to tell anyone else how to live theirs.
Here is two examples of what the enviro-nuts have supported: Strict CAFE Standards to reduce emissions which resulted in cars being built w/ lighter, weaker materials resulting in tens of thousands of fatalities in wrecks because their cars were crumbled like coke cans and the banned use of DDT under false pretenses which resulted in MILLIONS of children around the world dying from malaria from swarms of mosquitoes.
Nov 19th 2010 3:45PM Real climate change? the climate has changed infinite times before man even existed and will continue to change. Ever heard of an ice age? Dead polar bears? their population has soared in the past 10yrs...they must enjoy jacuzzi's too :)
But seriously, if man made climate change is really happening, why did they call it global cooling in the 80's and now its global warming for all the same reasons? We are simply not capable of changing the climate for an entire planet. Think about it.
And if you still believe it, then to reduce your "carbon footprint" simply stop breathing, start walking everywhere, stop using your computer thats uses evil energy and go live with nature. Set the example and maybe the rest of us will follow your example...
May 24th 2010 8:07AM I can't believe that the global warming hoax is being applied to WoW... despite what some "scientists" say about global warming being a direct result from man's use of fossil fuels, there is an equal, if not greater amount of scientist disputing this and offering scientific data to back it up. Of course the liberal media don't care to report this, because they are in bed with the enviro-nuts. Here is 4 simple arguments I like to use: 1) Through out the history of our planet, Earth has heated and cooled countless times (ever heard of an ice age?) and there wasn't any corporations around then 2) During the same time period the eco-nazis point to when claiming human caused global warming, the other planets in our solar system show the same percentage of temperature change as well (this is a solar thing and we don't drive SUV's on the Sun) 3) For the past 8 yrs, our planets average temperature has actually dropped every yr(these people claimed CO2 was making the world cool rapidly in the 80's) 4) the great champion of human caused global warming, Al Gore, flies around in private jets, rides around in non-hybrid motorcades, and buys multi-million dollar homes that use more electricity than my entire neighborhood. Don't you love the hypocrisy? Man made global warming is a hoax and the people who scream about it only want everyone else to go back to being cavemen while they make a fortune off of selliing carbon credits(the right to pollute) to people that can afford it. An small, elite governing class that controls the poor working class(the rest of us). Can everyone say Marxism??? How great has that turned out around the world?