Oct 28th 2011 2:30PM Tier 6 - I dont understand your choice of picking Holy Avenger.
Guardian in itself is pretty heavy mitigation. I don't quite see why I would need extra healing/mitigation on top of that during that period.
Oct 21st 2011 5:14PM My heart sinks... Could this be the end for me?
Feb 17th 2011 3:46AM Scratch mine, use Jbodar's idea.
Feb 17th 2011 3:26AM You do know that if at all he "bragged" about what he was doing using any of the ingame mechanics - ie ingame mail or chat - you could report him with proof? GMs would have loved to put a lot of things "up his" if they had proof.
Jan 4th 2011 9:59PM I dont know if/when it would be pratical. But after attaining a certain level of block thru mastery, that spike will look a lot more better, than 40 block rating enchant, for those min/maxing their character. Let some theorycarfters crunch some numbers and then we'll know.
Nov 23rd 2010 9:20AM What about AH? Will we have any means of accessing AH in Northrend/Outland? Please don't give engineering as an answer.
Oct 22nd 2010 1:22PM How about a little less attention on recount and a little more on your surroundings?
I know some effects could be exactly similar to some effects, in that case move out of that color no matter what. The rest of the effects are still good to be used in that particular encounter.
Oct 20th 2010 2:25PM I just hope Ashbringer gets attainable by players. Kill that stupid Tirion if you have to, I just want that sword.
Oct 20th 2010 5:42AM @Astalnar
As I said, settle your personal issues at your personal convenience. When alliance is in our town going for our warchief we do not "offer the guided tour right to his throne room ", we DEFEND. There is a difference between out-throwing a "tyrant" and being a traitor.
Oct 20th 2010 5:25AM Thrall appoints Garrosh as acting warchief. How much ever you oppose this decision of making Garrosh acting warchief, when Thrall suggested to be his advisor the most rational (I believe it's perfectly rational) thing to do would be to accept it.
Even if it absolutely seems like horde orcs (not cultist orcs) are behind those attacks, there does not seem like a direct link to Garrosh. Even if it were the case that Garrosh's personal bodyguards attacked elves and hamuul, when he denies those allegations you try to dig deep. Let him atleast provide his side of defense. Deciding that he is guilty based on situational evidence is rash.
Garrosh has always been a hothead, there was no doubt that he would accept the challenge. Cairne is, although, a seasoned leader. He should know better. Would it have been so hard to decline Garrosh's challenge of "duel to death" providing a reason like "I do not wish to kill you, just defeat you and claim the throne for the sake of our people." That wouldn't mean he was gonna come out of the duel alive (what with poisoned gorehowl and all) but accepting such a challenge is insane. Whoever wins in "duel to death", horde would lose one leader.
And the most important bit that made me wonder if Cairne was in his right mind: he hadn't appointed any second in command, or atleast didn't inform him about what he was gonna do. Even if you are absolutely sure you are gonna win, you always appoint a second in command. All those taurens wouldn't have died if his second in command knew about this duel and took measures to sieze control as soon as Cairne died. Leadership is more than just about right or wrong, it's about responsibility.