Skip to Content

WoW Insider has the latest on the Mists of Pandaria!
  • Fuzzl
  • Member Since Aug 4th, 2010

Are you Fuzzl? If So, Login Here.

BlogComments
WoW62 Comments

Recent Comments:

Spiritual Guidance: First hands-on look at the Mists of Pandaria shadow priest {WoW}

Apr 4th 2012 4:17PM Fox, I already loved you... But I love you even more now for using "streets ahead."

Spiritual Guidance: First hands-on look at the Mists of Pandaria shadow priest {WoW}

Apr 4th 2012 3:04PM I'm still feeling the changes out right now... I really like shadow on Live, so any change will take getting used to. I guess the biggest complaint right now is that shadow orbs seem...boring. I would like it if they maybe had a passive bonus (to make it more of a pro and con situation with whether or not to use them to get a shadow apparition hit) or if they were just plain used for more than one spell.

The Queue: Attack of the Killer Tomatoes {WoW}

Apr 4th 2012 11:06AM Next expansion ideas?... Go!

Raid Rx: Priest thoughts and the 100k mana club {WoW}

Apr 3rd 2012 1:36PM Isn't the 100k only for level 85? I could have sworn I had 120k mana when I hit 86 on the Beta.

Mists of Pandaria Beta: Mysterious ruins found beneath Scarlet Halls {WoW}

Apr 3rd 2012 1:09PM For those interested, this is (roughly) what the zones look like when put all together:
http://i141.photobucket.com/albums/r45/Lzzuf/Zones.png

(Keep in mind, I put that together pretty quickly so the scaling might not be perfect but you get the idea)

The Queue: Why it's not time for a warlock tank {WoW}

Apr 3rd 2012 12:24PM Yeah, I understand that, Puntable. My point was that after this expansion, the 1-59 portion of leveling that includes Garrosh will at some point have to overlap with the 90+ "new" Orgrimmar that does NOT have Garrosh in the lead.

It's not just a matter of leveling in a different continent that is in a different timeline, but rather leveling in a zone that includes two different timelines that overlap.

The Queue: Why it's not time for a warlock tank {WoW}

Apr 3rd 2012 12:08PM Yeah, I'd be fine with them phasing stuff out. I know you pointed out that it wouldn't be too confusing outside of Orgrimmar, Phil, and I definitely agree with that. But I also remember quite a few quests that have you return to Org to talk to Garrosh and it ends up being more than a generic quest-giver aspect of turning it in; a lot of the Garrosh quests in Orgrimmar have him playing a significant role (at least from what I remember). I think that's the part that will be especially confusing.

The Queue: Why it's not time for a warlock tank {WoW}

Apr 3rd 2012 12:06PM That was meant as a reply to something else :\ Down vote please.

The Queue: Why it's not time for a warlock tank {WoW}

Apr 3rd 2012 12:05PM Yeah, I'd be fine with them phasing stuff out. I know you pointed out that it wouldn't be too confusing outside of Orgrimmar, Phil, and I definitely agree with that. But I also remember quite a few quests that have you return to Org to talk to Garrosh and it ends up being more than a generic quest-giver aspect of turning it in; a lot of the Garrosh quests in Orgrimmar have him playing a significant role (at least from what I remember). I think that's the part that will be especially confusing.

The Queue: Why it's not time for a warlock tank {WoW}

Apr 3rd 2012 11:14AM Won't killing off Garrosh at the end of the Xpac cause (even more) huge continuity issues for the next expansion? He seems to play a pretty large role in some of the 1-60 zones now and having him warchief-ing all over the 1-60 places when he's not even warchief anymore seems like it would be really confusing.