Aug 18th 2007 10:23PM "at the beginning of the fight, you receive a buff giving you (essentially) unlimited health, mana, and rage regeneration for three minutes."
Hello? Did you even read the link you provided? Essence of the Red does not give health regeneration.
Aug 7th 2007 10:06PM I cannot believe someone thought this was newsworthy. It is obviously not a real release date and just CM teasing the oblivious and gullible.
These online stores just pick what they consider a 'reasonable' date and stick it on their site as a 'release date.'
Jul 29th 2007 2:45AM "Aside from that, I have to admit that having a gamer (and a Priest, at that) running for elected official would get some brownie points from me. Raiding requires people who are willing to work hard with a group, and that's definitely what I want to see in any elected official."
Are you fucking serious? Rofl. I hope this is a joke.
Jun 26th 2007 9:14PM @ Crypt King
At least this is honest to god info about WoW because like it or not, they're on top and that means they'll be talked about. Look at it this way, this could have been another post about the word rape or what some random author thinks is their most tedious monster or what faction God would play in WoW.
Jun 26th 2007 8:34PM @ Galipan: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RSS_Reader
Based on the url of the examples I'm guessing it isn't possible for me to filter out "frivolous crap" like "zomg what ur favorite quest" and "DON'T SAY RAPE" or "lol God iz ally!!1"
Jun 26th 2007 8:16PM I always felt like Question: Answer is a lazy form of journalism. There's nothing wrong with giving readers a transcript of the actual questions and their answers, but I really appreciate when a journalist goes the extra mile to put all the information they've gleaned from it into a comprehensive article, rather than just copy/pasting their email or typing their question straight into a news post.
So don't knock stratics for not having an "interview format" that's every bit as lazy as yours. It's still pretty close.
Jun 26th 2007 5:30PM To clarify: I'm not giving an opinion on if the word is good or bad, if you should or shouldn't use it, if people have a "right" to use it, if people shouldn't be offended by it or anything of the kind.
I'm saying you're a journalist, and this isn't news. This belongs on a forum.
Jun 26th 2007 5:26PM Your blog would be about 10x better if you stopped posting worthless crap like this.
People either use the word or they don't, you are not going to change that, and nor should you try.
May 29th 2007 8:31PM Uh.. No shit? What the hell did you think it was going to be?
May 28th 2007 3:43PM I think you're gay.
In all seriousness, I know a lot of homosexuals who use the word in the very same way themselves, so you can also imagine this means they aren't offended by it.
Also I find this comment hilariously hypocritical:
"My respect for people who say "That's a gay item", "That quest is so gay" and "XXX is gay, don't group with him" is so low as to be nonexistent. No matter how old you are, calling stuff gay makes you sound immature and ignorant. To me, you will forever be 15 years old and snickering about "buttsecks" at your lunch table."
You're saying you are willing to judge someone based on a single word they use, even WITHOUT knowing if they are biased against homosexuals and as I stated above, they could be gay themselves. So you automatically are going to call them bigots and immature? Doesn't that make you sound pretty immature? And I seem to recall a certain definition about judging someone prior to actually getting to know anything about them.