How do blues choose what to respond to?

This was part of the opening post on a thread in the US forums, discussing the Community Management team's choice of posts to respond to. And it's a reasonable question, a cursory glance at a blue tracker will reveal that many blue responses are indeed on light-hearted threads rather than on the ones demanding feedback on heavy issues. That, or they're commenting on quickly locked posts that violate the forum guidelines, elucidating the reasons for the thread's closure."Why do the blues only seem to comment on silly threads and never in a thread that has substance, provides meaningful insight, or merits actual discussion? This seems a complete waste of time and valuable resources."
Why don't the blues respond more quickly to the weighty, substantial threads? Consider the amount of work required in the background to respond to a question about PvP balancing, for example, compared to the amount of work required to wish a forum a happy Winter Veil. While the latter simply requires a lively wit and a good knowledge of the forum code of conduct, the latter requires a good deal more input, from the developers and designers and more.
Filed under: Analysis / Opinion, Blizzard, News items
Patch 5.3 interview with Ghostcrawler
Mystery of the Unborn Val'kyr
The latest patch 5.3 news
All of the latest Mists of Pandaria news


World of Warcraft: Mists of Pandaria is the next expansion, 
World of Warcraft: Cataclysm has destroyed Azeroth as we know it; nothing is the same! In 

Bashiok - No Blizzcon



Slorkuz




World of Warcraft: Cataclysm will destroy Azeroth as we know it. Nothing will be the same. In
In a recent set of posts on the subject of Prot Paladins wearing holy gear in PvP, 



